Case study

Steam trap failure monitoring

Natural gasPharmaceutical & ChemicalFood & beverage processing

A failed-open steam trap vents energy continuously and silently.

A pharmaceutical facility’s steam traps could remain failed open between periodic surveys. We follow their temperature signatures continuously and give the team a separate status for each trap to direct maintenance checks.

What the data showed

Explore the chart to inspect the readings.

Steam trap failure monitoring
HEALTHYREPLACET1: 2.0 kg/hT2: 3.0 kg/hT3: 21 kg/hT4: 4.0 kg/hT5: 2.0 kg/hT6: 14 kg/hT7: 3.0 kg/hT8: 2.0 kg/h2.03.0214.02.0143.02.0
STEAM LOSS BY TRAP · KG/H · DASHED = LIMIT
Chart data
IntervalSteam loss (kg/h)
T12.0
T23.0
T321
T44.0
T52.0
T614
T73.0
T82.0
Before and after, in words
BeforeAn annual survey and eleven months of hope
AfterA trap-by-trap status board that updates every minute

Background

A pharmaceutical manufacturing facility uses steam traps throughout its steam system. The team checks their condition through a periodic survey, leaving intervals when a trap’s behaviour is not being followed. Our monitoring focuses on those intervals, when a trap can fail open and continue losing energy until the next inspection.

The problem

A failed-open trap allows a continuous loss that becomes part of the gas bill. The bill combines that demand with the rest of the facility’s use, so it offers little help in locating the trap. Waiting for the next survey leaves the team without a current view of which traps need attention.

How we found it

We use surface temperature probes upstream and downstream of each trap. The readings provide a temperature signature that can flag a fail-open pattern. A dashboard shows the status of each trap separately, connecting the change in the readings with a specific location for maintenance to check.

What changed

The facility team has an ongoing view of trap condition between surveys. A changing signature gives them a reason to investigate an individual trap while the loss is occurring. The status board makes that information available as part of regular monitoring, with the history beside the current reading to help explain what changed.

The lesson

Use the temperature signature to direct maintenance checks. Keep monitoring after the repair so operations and maintenance can check that the expected pattern has returned.

What changed

Before

An annual survey and eleven months of hope

After

A trap-by-trap status board that updates every minute

Continuousmonitoring

Replaces an annual ultrasonic survey with an always-on temperature signature.

See where monitoring could help your facility.

Our team will walk your facility with you and identify where monitoring could help.

Book a site visitAll case studies

or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)